HR & Employment

Employment Tribunal Defence.

We defend employers across South Wales and the South West against employment tribunal claims, from early conciliation through to the hearing. Act fast: you generally have 28 days to file your response, and missing it can mean losing by default.

Have a quick question? Skip to common questions
Employment Tribunal Defence
About this service

Defending employment tribunal claims

If your business is facing an employment tribunal claim, the first thing that matters is speed, because strict deadlines apply from the moment the claim arrives. We defend employers across South Wales and the South West against the full range of claims, manage the process from start to finish, and give you a straight assessment of whether to fight or settle. The response you file at the outset sets the foundation for the whole defence.

What is the deadline to respond?

You generally have 28 days from the date the claim was sent to file your response, on a form called the ET3, and missing it can lead to a default judgment, meaning the claim may succeed without you being able to defend it. The ET3 is difficult to amend later, so it has to be accurate and complete from the start. The single most important step on receiving a claim is to note the deadline, preserve all the relevant documents, and take advice promptly.

What claims can an employee bring?

The common ones are unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, discrimination, harassment and victimisation under the Equality Act 2010, unlawful deductions, whistleblowing, and redundancy and family-rights claims. The type of claim matters a great deal, because some, such as discrimination and whistleblowing, need no minimum service and carry uncapped compensation, making them the most significant in terms of exposure. Getting an early, realistic read on which claims have been brought, and how strong they are, shapes everything that follows.

How does the process work?

Before most claims can be brought, the employee must contact Acas for early conciliation, a free and confidential chance to settle, and the conciliation period was extended to up to 12 weeks for notifications from December 2025. If the claim proceeds, you file the ET3 response, then the case moves through case management, disclosure of documents, exchange of witness statements and, ultimately, a hearing. There are opportunities to settle throughout, and most claims are resolved before a hearing.

What is the financial exposure?

It depends on the claim. Unfair dismissal compensation is currently capped, although that cap is due to be removed from January 2027, while discrimination and whistleblowing awards are uncapped and can include a separate sum for injury to feelings. Just as importantly, the tribunal is largely a costs-neutral jurisdiction: even if you successfully defend a claim, you will usually not recover your legal costs from the claimant. That makes the cost of defending a central factor in deciding whether to defend or settle.

Is settling better than fighting?

Often, but not always. Settling avoids the cost, management time, delay and uncertainty of a hearing, and tribunal delays are currently significant. But the right answer depends on the strength of the claim, the realistic exposure and your objectives. We assess the merits honestly and, where settlement makes sense, negotiate and document it, including through our settlement agreements work. The best defence, though, is built long before any claim, through fair processes and good records.

What does it cost?

For certain employment tribunal claims, our charges and the typical stages and timescales are set out on our employment tribunal pricing page, in line with the price transparency rules for this work. For more complex matters outside that scope, we charge by the hour with a written estimate at the outset. Because a successful employer usually cannot recover its costs, we are always clear about the likely cost and the realistic exposure so you can make an informed commercial decision.

Speak to our employment team

If a claim has landed, do not wait, the clock is already running. Request a callback and we will get straight back to you.

On a tribunal claim, the response sets up the whole defence. We get it right, and weigh defending against settling honestly.

Our approach
How we work

Clear advice. Practical next steps.

Every employment tribunal defence matter is different. We start by understanding your situation before we recommend an approach.

We won't push you toward a process that doesn't fit. We won't drag things out. And we'll always tell you what something will cost before we start it.

  • A dedicated specialist for your matter, backed by the wider Robertsons HR & employment team
  • Transparent pricing — clear written costs before any work begins
  • Plain-English advice — no jargon, no surprises
  • Offices across South Wales and the South West
What employment tribunal defence clients say

Real stories from real clients

★★★★★
“Great staff - professional, effective and efficient. Thank you for your help!”
Ellie Atkins Tate
★★★★★
“Efficient, prompt and easy to deal with.”
David Fawcitt
★★★★★
“Fantastic experience with Robertsons Solicitors. Kept well informed at every step of the proceedings. Achieved an amazing result and I highly recommend them - friendly and professional.”
Jens
Common questions

Questions clients ask us about employment tribunal defence

Unlike in the civil courts, costs do not normally follow the event in the employment tribunal — which means that even if your business successfully defends a claim, it will usually not recover its legal costs from the claimant. Each party generally bears its own costs. Costs awards in the tribunal are the exception rather than the rule, and are generally only made in limited circumstances — for example, where a party (or their representative) has acted vexatiously, abusively, disruptively, or otherwise unreasonably in bringing or conducting the proceedings, or where a claim or response had no reasonable prospect of success. Even where the threshold for a costs award is met, the tribunal has discretion whether to make one. This costs regime is an important practical consideration for employers: because the costs of defending a claim are generally irrecoverable even on a successful defence, the cost of defending must be weighed against the cost of settling when deciding how to respond to a claim. We advise on this balance as part of the overall strategy.

Yes — a tribunal claim can be settled at any stage, and most claims are in fact resolved before a final hearing. Settling can be a sensible commercial decision, avoiding the cost, time, management distraction, and uncertainty of a contested hearing, as well as the risk of an adverse finding and any associated reputational impact. There are two main ways to settle an employment claim: through ACAS, resulting in a binding COT3 agreement; or through a settlement agreement (a formal written agreement under which the employee waives their claims, usually in return for a payment, and which must meet specific statutory requirements to be valid). The decision whether and when to settle, and on what terms, is a strategic and commercial one — it depends on the strength of the claim, the potential exposure, the cost of defending, and the business's objectives. Settling early can be considerably cheaper than fighting to a hearing, but the right approach depends on the circumstances. We advise employers on the merits of settlement versus defence and negotiate and document settlements to protect the business.

The best defence to an employment claim is laid long before any claim is brought, through sound HR practice and good record-keeping. Measures that strengthen an employer's position include: having clear, up-to-date contracts of employment and staff policies, and applying them consistently; following fair and proper procedures in disciplinary, grievance, capability, and dismissal situations — and in particular following the ACAS Code of Practice; documenting decisions and the reasons for them at the time they are made, as contemporaneous records are powerful evidence; ensuring managers are trained to handle issues such as performance, conduct, and grievances properly; addressing problems promptly and fairly rather than letting them escalate; and taking advice before taking significant steps such as dismissals, restructures, or redundancies. Where a dismissal or other action is handled fairly and properly documented at the time, the employer is in a far stronger position if a claim is later brought. Investing in good HR practice and taking advice at key moments is the most effective way to reduce both the likelihood of claims and the exposure if one is brought. We help employers get these foundations right.

From the employer's perspective, the tribunal process follows a series of stages after the claim and response. Following the ET1 claim and the ET3 response, the tribunal will usually give case management directions — a timetable for the steps leading to the hearing. These typically include: disclosure, where both sides exchange the documents relevant to the issues; the preparation of an agreed bundle of documents for the hearing; the exchange of witness statements, setting out the evidence each witness will give; and, in some cases, a preliminary hearing to deal with particular issues. The matter then proceeds to the final hearing, at which the tribunal hears the evidence and submissions and decides the claim. Throughout, there are opportunities to settle, and many claims are resolved before the hearing. Preparing properly at each stage — thorough disclosure, well-drafted witness statements, and a clear presentation of the defence — is essential to a successful outcome. The process can be demanding on management time and requires careful preparation. We guide employers through each stage and represent them at the hearing.

Your business generally has 28 days to respond to an employment tribunal claim, running from the date the tribunal sent a copy of the claim (the ET1) to the employer. The response is made on a form called the ET3. This deadline is strict and important: if your business does not file a response in time, the tribunal can issue a default judgment, meaning the claim may succeed without your business having the chance to defend it, and a remedy may be determined against you. If more time is genuinely needed, it is possible to apply for an extension, but this must be done properly and there is no guarantee it will be granted. Because the time limit is short and the consequences of missing it serious, it is essential to act as soon as a claim is received — noting the deadline immediately, gathering the necessary information, and taking advice in good time to prepare a proper response. Leaving the response to the last minute risks both missing the deadline and filing an inadequate defence.

The cost of defending an employment tribunal claim depends on the nature and complexity of the claim, how strongly it is contested, and how far it proceeds. For certain employment tribunal claims, information about our charges is set out on our employment tribunal pricing page, in accordance with the price transparency requirements that apply to this type of work — please refer to that page for details of our fees and the typical stages and timescales involved. For matters falling outside the scope of that pricing information, or which are more complex, we charge on our usual basis and provide a written cost estimate at the outset, updated as the matter progresses. Because the tribunal costs regime means a successful employer usually cannot recover its costs from the claimant, the cost of defending is an important factor in deciding whether to defend or settle a claim. We always discuss the likely costs, the realistic exposure, and the options at the outset, so your business can make an informed commercial decision about how to respond.

The first priority on receiving a tribunal claim is to act quickly, because strict time limits apply. The key first steps are: note the deadline for responding — your business generally has 28 days from the date the claim (the ET1) was sent to file its response, and missing this can result in a default judgment; read the claim carefully to understand what is being alleged and on what basis; gather and preserve all relevant documents and information, including the employee's file, contracts, policies, correspondence, and any records relevant to the allegations; avoid taking any action that could be seen as victimisation of the claimant if they are still employed; and take legal advice promptly, as the response sets the foundation for the defence and is difficult to amend later. Do not ignore the claim or assume it will go away. Early, organised action — understanding the claim, preserving evidence, and getting advice — puts your business in the strongest position to defend the claim effectively or to resolve it on acceptable terms.

If a business loses an employment tribunal claim, the potential financial consequences depend on the type of claim. For unfair dismissal, compensation usually comprises a basic award (calculated by reference to age, length of service, and a capped weekly pay figure) and a compensatory award for financial losses, which is subject to a statutory cap (or a year's pay, if lower) — though certain claims, such as automatically unfair dismissals, are uncapped. For discrimination and whistleblowing claims, compensation is uncapped and can include compensation for financial loss and for injury to feelings, making these claims potentially the most significant in terms of exposure. The tribunal can also order other remedies, such as reinstatement or re-engagement in unfair dismissal cases, and can make additional awards — for example, for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice. Beyond the award itself, the business bears its own legal costs and the indirect costs of management time. Understanding the realistic exposure at an early stage is essential to making sound decisions about defending or settling. We assess the potential exposure and advise accordingly.

A COT3 and a settlement agreement are both legally binding ways to settle an employment dispute and waive an employee's claims, but they differ in form and process. A COT3 is the agreement recording a settlement reached through ACAS conciliation — it is brokered by an ACAS conciliator, and because it is reached through ACAS, it does not need to meet the formal statutory requirements that apply to settlement agreements. It is typically shorter and simpler. A settlement agreement (formerly called a compromise agreement) is a formal written agreement reached directly between the parties, which must meet specific statutory conditions to be valid — including that the employee has received independent legal advice on the terms and effect of the agreement, and that it identifies the particular claims being waived. Settlement agreements can be more detailed and can cover wider matters — such as confidentiality, references, and restrictive covenants — making them suitable for more complex separations. Which is appropriate depends on the circumstances, including whether ACAS is involved and how much detail the settlement needs to cover. We advise on the best approach and prepare the necessary documentation.

ACAS early conciliation is a mandatory step that must take place before most employment tribunal claims can be brought. Before issuing a claim, the prospective claimant must contact ACAS (the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service), which offers both parties the opportunity to resolve the dispute through conciliation — a free, confidential process in which an ACAS conciliator helps the parties explore settlement — without going to tribunal. For an employer, early conciliation is significant for several reasons: it provides an early opportunity to understand and potentially resolve the dispute before the cost and risk of tribunal proceedings; engaging constructively can lead to a cost-effective settlement; and any settlement reached through ACAS is recorded in a binding COT3 agreement. Participation in conciliation is voluntary — neither party is obliged to settle — but it is worth engaging seriously, as resolving a claim early is often far less costly than defending it to a hearing. The early conciliation period also affects the time limits for bringing a claim. Taking advice during early conciliation helps an employer assess the claim and decide on the right approach.

The ET3 is the form on which an employer responds to an employment tribunal claim. It is a crucial document — it sets out the employer's defence and frames the issues for the rest of the proceedings, and it is difficult to amend later, so it must be prepared carefully and accurately. The ET3 needs to: confirm whether the employer resists (defends) the claim; set out the grounds of resistance — the employer's account of the relevant facts and the legal basis for defending the claim; respond to the specific allegations made in the claim; and provide the required information about the business and the employment. A well-prepared ET3 tells a clear, accurate, and consistent account that addresses each allegation and sets up the defence to be run at the hearing. A poorly prepared response — incomplete, inconsistent, or failing to address key allegations — can seriously weaken the defence and is hard to put right later. Because the ET3 is so important and the deadline is short, it should be prepared with legal advice. We can draft or review the response to ensure your business's defence is properly presented from the outset.

Employees and former employees can bring a range of claims in the employment tribunal. The most common include: unfair dismissal, where the employee alleges they were dismissed without a fair reason or a fair process; wrongful dismissal, concerning notice and breach of contract; discrimination, harassment, or victimisation related to a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 (such as sex, race, age, disability, religion, or pregnancy); unlawful deductions from wages; claims relating to holiday pay, the national minimum wage, or working time; redundancy payment disputes; whistleblowing detriment claims; and claims relating to family-related rights such as maternity, paternity, and flexible working. Some claims, such as discrimination and whistleblowing, do not require a minimum period of employment and can carry uncapped compensation, making them particularly significant. The nature of the claim determines the legal tests that apply, the evidence required, and the potential exposure. Understanding exactly what is being claimed — and the strength of the allegations — is the starting point for any defence. We can assess the claims against your business and advise on the prospects and strategy.

Have a question that isn't covered here? Speak to one of our employment tribunal defence specialists directly.

Get started with our employment tribunal defence team

Confidential, no pressure, and we'll explain what's involved before you commit to anything.